<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Arend visits Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arendvr.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arendvr.com</link>
	<description>Personal website of Arend v. Reinersdorff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by My Sentry</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>My Sentry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-655</guid>
		<description>I also just wanted to say thanks very much for folders4gmail for the last couple of years. It was for me too a deciding factor in moving to gmail and I couldn&#039;t have lived without it! Thanks for all the time and effort you put into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also just wanted to say thanks very much for folders4gmail for the last couple of years. It was for me too a deciding factor in moving to gmail and I couldn&#8217;t have lived without it! Thanks for all the time and effort you put into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by Vincent Liopard.</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Liopard.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 18:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-653</guid>
		<description>Regarding to rename from backslashes to slashes, no one noticed that it will break many filters.

GMail filters seems to not understand slashes as labels and are broken this way.

I am the only one person in the world that noticed this bug?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding to rename from backslashes to slashes, no one noticed that it will break many filters.</p>
<p>GMail filters seems to not understand slashes as labels and are broken this way.</p>
<p>I am the only one person in the world that noticed this bug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by Greg</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-650</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for your work to offer us Folder4Gmail. It was a great great feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for your work to offer us Folder4Gmail. It was a great great feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by Mike</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Surrano&#039;s solution is stupid.  The whole point of folders and nested labels is so that everything is visible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surrano&#8217;s solution is stupid.  The whole point of folders and nested labels is so that everything is visible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by teejayhanton</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>teejayhanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Thank you for providing your extension when Gmail didn&#039;t have the feature. Your work really made my inbox easy to manage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for providing your extension when Gmail didn&#8217;t have the feature. Your work really made my inbox easy to manage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by belg4mit</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>belg4mit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Nested labels sucks. Not only is it something that Google can decide to take unsupport at any time (though the same could be said of Folders4Gmail), it craps out if you have many labels. Because Gmail is already so JavaScript heavy, the extra overhead makes initial loading painful and can cause a script timeout error. Surrano&#039;s solution is of no help if you have deep labels, e.g; I have one folder with several dozen underneath, and hiding sub-folders is asinine. Yet as a plugin e.g; in Better Gmail2; it seems to run separately and is therefore *much* faster. Viva FoldersGmail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nested labels sucks. Not only is it something that Google can decide to take unsupport at any time (though the same could be said of Folders4Gmail), it craps out if you have many labels. Because Gmail is already so JavaScript heavy, the extra overhead makes initial loading painful and can cause a script timeout error. Surrano&#8217;s solution is of no help if you have deep labels, e.g; I have one folder with several dozen underneath, and hiding sub-folders is asinine. Yet as a plugin e.g; in Better Gmail2; it seems to run separately and is therefore *much* faster. Viva FoldersGmail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by Surrano</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Surrano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 08:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-644</guid>
		<description>I discovered that nested labels are not so sluggish after all... provided that the number of _visible_ (i.e. not hidden) labels is not too much.

With 1700 hidden labels and a total of 23 shown (if expanded) it&#039;s piece of cake to log in or do anything else.

What&#039;s the catch, you might ask. First, you have to hide all those tons of labels. But if you click &quot;Hide all&quot; you can wait... possibly forever (I waited some 3 hours for it to finish, but it didn&#039;t) and the labels will not be hidden after all. So here&#039;s how:

1. Turn off Nested Labels lab. Voila, GMail is more responsive than ever. :)

2. Go to Settings -&gt; Labels, and hide all.

3. Unhide (Show) those you wish to keep visible. Don&#039;t forget parents as well!

4. Enable Nested Labels lab. And, surprise, it works with an acceptable speed.

Note: if you wish to use nested labels GMail just like you use My Machine in Windows (everything&#039;s visible, just click-click-click...) it&#039;s not much of an option for you.

If, however, you use GMail just like me, i.e. 
- Create tons of labels, in a shallow but wide structure 
- Assign labels to mark conversations (many labels per conversation), especially those lacking the proper search keywords
- Look up labels by searching for them (i.e. write &quot;l:Family-Mum&quot; -- note the dash instead of slash)

this is one possible good way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered that nested labels are not so sluggish after all&#8230; provided that the number of _visible_ (i.e. not hidden) labels is not too much.</p>
<p>With 1700 hidden labels and a total of 23 shown (if expanded) it&#8217;s piece of cake to log in or do anything else.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the catch, you might ask. First, you have to hide all those tons of labels. But if you click &#8220;Hide all&#8221; you can wait&#8230; possibly forever (I waited some 3 hours for it to finish, but it didn&#8217;t) and the labels will not be hidden after all. So here&#8217;s how:</p>
<p>1. Turn off Nested Labels lab. Voila, GMail is more responsive than ever. <img src='http://arendvr.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>2. Go to Settings -&gt; Labels, and hide all.</p>
<p>3. Unhide (Show) those you wish to keep visible. Don&#8217;t forget parents as well!</p>
<p>4. Enable Nested Labels lab. And, surprise, it works with an acceptable speed.</p>
<p>Note: if you wish to use nested labels GMail just like you use My Machine in Windows (everything&#8217;s visible, just click-click-click&#8230;) it&#8217;s not much of an option for you.</p>
<p>If, however, you use GMail just like me, i.e.<br />
- Create tons of labels, in a shallow but wide structure<br />
- Assign labels to mark conversations (many labels per conversation), especially those lacking the proper search keywords<br />
- Look up labels by searching for them (i.e. write &#8220;l:Family-Mum&#8221; &#8212; note the dash instead of slash)</p>
<p>this is one possible good way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by Emilio Mejia</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilio Mejia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 18:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks a bunch for keeping this feature available to us while Google got their act together. It has been greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks a bunch for keeping this feature available to us while Google got their act together. It has been greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by Larry</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 08:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Hi Arend
You have done a great job with F4Gm.
I have switched my hundreds of folders over to labs and once I sorted my case sensitivity out - as you outlined in your 5 tips, everything fell into place.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arend<br />
You have done a great job with F4Gm.<br />
I have switched my hundreds of folders over to labs and once I sorted my case sensitivity out &#8211; as you outlined in your 5 tips, everything fell into place.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great News: Gmail now has Folders by Japan Shah</title>
		<link>http://arendvr.com/2010/04/09/great-news-gmail-now-has-folders/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Japan Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arendvr.com/?p=221#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Hi,

    Thanks for the information, but I&#039;m agree with Mike........gmail lab feature for folders is really crap for large number of labels ! which folders4gmail handled nicely.......

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>    Thanks for the information, but I&#8217;m agree with Mike&#8230;&#8230;..gmail lab feature for folders is really crap for large number of labels ! which folders4gmail handled nicely&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
